Welcome to Rainbow City Alabama


Charity - a Gift of the Heart

Kahlil Gibran, a Lebanese poet who livedwages to the benefit of this poor widow. Not
around the turn of the last century, onceone man responded to his proposition and the
wrote, "You give but little when you give ofbill was soundly defeated. The principle he
your possessions. It is when you give offought for was learned many years earlier
yourself that you truly give." This has beenfrom a constituent who, in response to a
on my mind much over the past year withsimilar bill passed for the benefit of
natural disasters and human suffering on anrefugees from a large fire in Washington,
unprecedented  scale  around  the  globe.called attention to the fact that nowhere in
the Constitution does it give Congress the
I read not long ago a call for all goodauthority to give away public money for
Christians to support higher taxes socharity. It was a lesson well learned by Davy
government could do more to help the poor andCrockett, and hopefully by us as well. For a
needy. It disturbed me that someone wouldfull  text  of  the  story  click  here.
appeal to my religious beliefs to support
increased government "charity." Is thatThe problem with government assistance is
really what charity is? While most religionsthat the only thing they really have to offer
teach that we have an obligation to care foris money. By contrast, charities like the Red
one another, government bureaucracy shouldCross, Salvation Army and religious
not be what first comes to mind whenorganizations, for which I have gained a new
considering  that  responsibility.appreciation, provide hands-on,
person-to-person, basic services. All
Taxes are not charity. They are coerced andcharitable organizations have overhead costs,
not freely given. I am not saying that therebut reputable charities keep them to a
is no place for government in helping tominimum and encourage volunteerism to
relieve human suffering. We rightfully expectminimize labor costs. The Red Cross alone in
our public officials to warn us of impendingjust the past month has raised over a billion
danger whenever possible and give usdollars which will be used not only to meet
life-saving advice. We must be able to countimmediate needs, but also to train volunteers
on our police and fire departments and, onand purchase equipment to handle future
occasion, our national guard troops, toemergencies.
protect us from danger and keep the peace.
Our transportation departments, weatherIn television coverage of the aftermath of
centers, and other similar agencies, bothHurricane Rita, a reporter commented on the
local  and  state, provide valuable services.citizens of rural Louisiana and Texas saying
something to the effect, "They were mostly
However, when we speak of true charity -farmers, shrimpers, ranchers, outdoors
feeding and clothing the needy, providingpeople. They know how to make do with very
shelter, encouragement, and a hundred otherlittle. They're not waiting for FEMA, they're
necessities - that is not the business ofjust getting on with their lives". I drove
government. That role is best filled bypast Thistle the other day and thought of
private entities and individuals. Government,those days, over 20 years ago, when neighbor
by its very nature, is unsuited to the workhelped neighbor to move personal belongings
of charity. It is intentionally burdensome,and save what could be saved before the flood
slow to change and react. As inconvenient aswaters took it all. Exactly the same thing
this may be in today's world of instanthappened this past January with the flooding
messaging, instant gratification, instantin St. George and Cedar Hills. Probably, many
everything, it is a safeguard which makesof us remember the Teton Dam flood which
government less susceptible to the whims ofobliterated a large swath of south-eastern
society. Government's role, then, in the workIdaho. Many from all over our area were
of charity should be that of providing ancalled on to travel to Rexburg and
environment which allows, even encourages andsurrounding areas to help in the cleanup
rewards, the charitable efforts of privateefforts.
entities  and  individuals.
There is much we can do, for ourselves and
Davy Crockett - frontiersman, soldier,for others, without relying on government.
politician, American hero - struggled toSome erroneously believe their individual
define the role of government in charitabledonation, whether of money or time, could not
acts. As a member of Congress, a bill camepossibly make a difference. But, it is there,
before the body appropriating money for thein the giving and receiving, that we find our
benefit of the widow of a distinguished navalhumanity. I believe that it strengthens us as
officer. Many eloquent speeches were given inindividuals  and  strengthens  our community.
favor of this bill and, until Davy Crockett
rose to speak, the passage of this bill wasIt is my hope and prayer is that we as
assured. He said, in part, "I will not gocitizens of this beautiful community and this
into an argument to prove that Congress hasgreat state and nation will continue to be
no power to appropriate this money as an actactively involved in charitable donations of
of charity. Every member upon this floortime and means and not passively stand by
knows it. We have the right, as individuals,waiting for government to fill that role.
to give away as much of our own money as weSurely, the consequences of such selflessness
please in charity; but as members of Congresswill be the blessings of heaven for ourselves
we have no right so to appropriate a dollarand those we touch, and also allowing and
of the public money." He then issued aencouraging government to once again assume
challenge to each member of Congress totheir proper role.
follow his example and donate one week's



1 A B C D E F 85 86 87 88 89 90 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134